- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:23:26 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
Le 21/06/11 07:47, "Martin J. Dürst" a écrit : >>> Normalization of stylesheets and other documents may not make sense, > > Normalization of stylesheets, or more correctly normalization of > stylesheets and the Web pages where they get used (to take care of class > and id values that appear in selectors), makes quite a bit of sense. Class and id ? what about element names in XML ? what about attribute name and values ? what about the following selectors where the type element selector matches elements with name komets-alef אָ[ref="çà"] (selector/element name is U+05D0 U+05B8) and אָ[ref="çà"] (selector/element name is U+FB2F) Let's be clear: *everything* in markup languages, DOM, CSS, transformation languages and more has to be normalized at some point to allow direct comparisons. That's what I don't understand why this normalization issue is hitting CSS only at this time. The issue is so broad that it has to be discussed at W3C-wide level. I recommend a note/spec/TAG decision/ whatever is made and that RECs released **after that document** have to deal with normalization. If CSS is the only one to implement normalization, that's almost useless. So no need to block *us only*. </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 06:23:55 UTC