- From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:34:30 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Or perhaps... "Why do these render the same? (a) linear-gradient(bottom, red, blue); (b) linear-gradient(0deg, red, blue); " > -----Original Message----- > From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Tab Atkins Jr. > Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 5:22 PM > To: Simon Fraser > Cc: www-style list > Subject: Re: [css3-images] Summary of recent gradient issues > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > > In my quick Twitter straw poll, everyone, without exception, said that > > linear-gradient(left, black, white) would have black on the left, so > > 'left' denotes the start point. There was zero confusion on this > > issue, which provides support for #5 and demotes #4. > > What if you then asked "Given that 270deg points to the left, do you expect > linear-gradient(270deg,black,white) to be the same or opposite linear- > gradient(left,black,white)?"? ^_^ > > ~TJ >
Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2011 01:34:59 UTC