- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:33:34 +0900
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 06/10/2011 08:23 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Brian Manthos<brianman@microsoft.com> wrote: >> Paraphrasing [1]: >> When specified via angle, the angle can be understood as both the direction ("toward the<angle>") and the ending point ("ends at<angle>"). >> >> Paraphrasing [2] and [3]: >> When specified via keyword, the keyword can be understood as both opposite direction ("away from the<keyword(s)>") and the starting point ("starts at<keyword>"). >> >> >> Is it intentional that these two ways of specifying gradient-line are opposite? > > I've just committed a change to switch the way keywords are interpreted. This type of change would require a WG resolution. > I'm sticking with top/right/bottom/left for now, but explicitly saying > that they indicate where the ending-point of the gradient should be. > > In the same commit, I also fixed the spec bug where interpolating from > "left" (270deg) to "top" (0deg) would give a 270deg CCW rotation, This is fine to fix on your own. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 02:34:10 UTC