- From: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:50:38 -0700
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 00:51:27 UTC
Hi Alex, Thanks for bringing up the counter-increment precedent. I am also interested in understanding the reasoning, but if both are possible, we do not have strong feelings either way. Vincent On Jun 6, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Alex Mogilevsky wrote: When we discussed it at F2F, it seemed that using <identifier> type for flow name would not be appropriate, because the ident could be anything and it might conflict with current or future keywords. Is there a rule or an earlier decision on where ident is OK to use and where it has to be a string? There seems to be a precedent of ‘counter-increment’ being <identifier> (with the values of 'none', 'inherit' and 'initial' being not allowed). Is that approach now considered inferior? Would be good to have a reference to reasoning that supports the decision. Thanks Alex
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 00:51:27 UTC