- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <andrew.fedoniouk@live.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 23:03:47 -0700
- To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, <www-style@w3.org>
>From: fantasai Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 7:32 PM To: www-style@w3.org
>Subject: Re: [css3-flexbox] getting multiline flexbox back into the spec
>On 06/04/2011 01:40 PM, Alex Mogilevsky wrote:
>> ± From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com]
>> ± Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 2:01 PM
>> ±
>
>Option 6:
>
> flex-orientation: rows | columns | horizontal | vertical
>
> flex-wrap: no-wrap | wrap | balance*
>
> flex-direction: [ forward | backward ] || reverse-stack
>
>* taken from howcome's balance-lines suggestion, to show how it would be
>added
> if we decide to add it for flexbox
>
? What exactly will be rendered in this case:
.flex-container {
flex-orientation: rows;
flex-wrap: no-wrap; /* wrapping what actually? */
direction: rtl;
flex-direction: backward;
}
.flex-container > * { width:50%; }
with this markup:
<div .flex-container>
<p>1</p>
<p>2</p>
<p>3</p>
<p>4</p>
</div>
--
Andrew Fedoniouk
http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 06:04:15 UTC