- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <andrew.fedoniouk@live.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 23:03:47 -0700
- To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, <www-style@w3.org>
>From: fantasai Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 7:32 PM To: www-style@w3.org >Subject: Re: [css3-flexbox] getting multiline flexbox back into the spec >On 06/04/2011 01:40 PM, Alex Mogilevsky wrote: >> ± From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] >> ± Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 2:01 PM >> ± > >Option 6: > > flex-orientation: rows | columns | horizontal | vertical > > flex-wrap: no-wrap | wrap | balance* > > flex-direction: [ forward | backward ] || reverse-stack > >* taken from howcome's balance-lines suggestion, to show how it would be >added > if we decide to add it for flexbox > ? What exactly will be rendered in this case: .flex-container { flex-orientation: rows; flex-wrap: no-wrap; /* wrapping what actually? */ direction: rtl; flex-direction: backward; } .flex-container > * { width:50%; } with this markup: <div .flex-container> <p>1</p> <p>2</p> <p>3</p> <p>4</p> </div> -- Andrew Fedoniouk http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 06:04:15 UTC