- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:22:10 +0200
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Le 01/06/11 08:37, Sylvain Galineau a écrit : > If we do read it with a strict eye then only ::before and ::after are > supported [1]...so I'd very much argue against reading this normatively > at this point :) [1] is only an editor's draft. The current REC says nothing but 'pseudo- element'. And that's what should be implemented at this time. </Daniel>
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 17:22:38 UTC