> Well, the way I thought of it was to stretch a square to determine the > length, angle, and placement of the gradient path. But still place the color > stops along the final path within the final rectangle. What Behnam made me > think though is that the final angle shouldn't be based on the path of the > two gradient endpoints (45deg to connect two corners), but rather on a path > perpendicular to the OTHER two endpoints. Once you resolve what the final > used angle should be in degrees, you just treat it like those degrees were > specified by the author. Brad, that's exactly how I have implemented it, "prependicular to the other two endpoints", but it worth noting that the result vector would be mirror of the vector for "normal" mode based on one of y=x or y=-x lines. Now that I'm thinking more, a generalization of this would be allowing basic math operations on the vectors, like "45deg - (bottom right)". Thanks all for the comments, -Behnam -- ' بهنام اسفهبد ' Behnam Esfahbod ' * .. http://behnam.esfahbod.info * ` * http://zwnj.org * o * 3E7F B4B6 6F4C A8AB 9BB9 7520 5701 CA40 259E 0F8BReceived on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 05:46:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:02 UTC