Re: [CSS OM] list of issues

On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:05:41 +0200, Sylvain Galineau  
<> wrote:
> The issue I raised was actually far more pedestrian than which  
> pseudo-elements
> are exposed through the OM or whether the render tree should be  
> available. The
> question was: given a pseudo-element ::foo exposed through the second  
> optional
> argument to getComputedStyle(), what are the string values that map to  
> ::foo ?
> Is it: "::foo" only ? "::foo" or ":foo" ? "::foo" or ":foo" or "foo" ?  
> In other
> words, what constitutes the name of ::foo for this argument ?
> not clear that the

Well per the current specification it would only be ":after", "::after",  
":before" and "::before". If we allow new post CSS 2.1 pseudo-elements it  
would only be "::foo" where foo is the name of the new pseudo-element.

Anne van Kesteren

Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2011 08:10:34 UTC