- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 10:09:57 +0200
- To: "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, "Sylvain Galineau" <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:05:41 +0200, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: > The issue I raised was actually far more pedestrian than which > pseudo-elements > are exposed through the OM or whether the render tree should be > available. The > question was: given a pseudo-element ::foo exposed through the second > optional > argument to getComputedStyle(), what are the string values that map to > ::foo ? > > Is it: "::foo" only ? "::foo" or ":foo" ? "::foo" or ":foo" or "foo" ? > In other > words, what constitutes the name of ::foo for this argument ? > not clear that the Well per the current specification it would only be ":after", "::after", ":before" and "::before". If we allow new post CSS 2.1 pseudo-elements it would only be "::foo" where foo is the name of the new pseudo-element. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2011 08:10:34 UTC