Re: [CSS OM] list of issues

On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:22:10 +0200, Daniel Glazman  
<> wrote:
> Le 01/06/11 08:37, Sylvain Galineau a écrit :
>> If we do read it with a strict eye then only ::before and ::after are
>> supported [1] I'd very much argue against reading this normatively
>> at this point :)
> [1] is only an editor's draft. The current REC says nothing but 'pseudo-
> element'. And that's what should be implemented at this time.

The current REC does not address important interoperability issues such as so it is unlikely to be  
followed, I think.

Anne van Kesteren

Received on Monday, 4 July 2011 16:03:57 UTC