- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 18:03:18 +0200
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:22:10 +0200, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > Le 01/06/11 08:37, Sylvain Galineau a écrit : >> If we do read it with a strict eye then only ::before and ::after are >> supported [1]...so I'd very much argue against reading this normatively >> at this point :) > > [1] is only an editor's draft. The current REC says nothing but 'pseudo- > element'. And that's what should be implemented at this time. The current REC does not address important interoperability issues such as https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14563 so it is unlikely to be followed, I think. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 4 July 2011 16:03:57 UTC