- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 23:30:19 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 04/07/11 17:46, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> one HTML 4 erratum often listed between 1998 and now is about >> the lack of a disabled HTML attribute on <link> and <style> to >> reflect the CSS OM disabled attribute on stylesheets. Because of >> that, it is impossible to save the disabled status of an embedded or >> linked stylesheet. I think we should add at least a note here >> and make sure the WHATWG and HTML WG have that on their radar. >> >> We need a similar mechanism for the XML processing instruction. > > There is a lot of state that cannot be serialized at the moment. E.g. > the alternate style sheet API. I am not really sure it is that desirable > either. This is mostly something scripts want to do on the fly, not > something that needs to be persisted by editors. Anne, please... You have experience with the OM, I have experience with editors. Please trust me here. This is _needed_. </Daniel>
Received on Monday, 4 July 2011 21:30:55 UTC