W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Possible typos in CSS 2.1 grammar

From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:06:18 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTik1nB_thjDmwk8=BwZG2vhu50wM25Jz0EeZTyBh@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Beam <dbeam@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Thanks for the report Dan. I'm cc'ing this to www-style so that we can
make sure to get it in the queue for CSS 2.1.


On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 16:52, Dan Beam <dbeam@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> Hi Tantek,
> I think I've found two minor bugs in the CSS 2.1 Grammar, G.2 Lexical Scanner section -
>    {baduri}                 {return BAD_URI);}
>    {badstring}             {return BAD_STRING);}
> These two statements (I believe) shouldn't have an end parenthesis, as this is just embedded C/C++ (as it is Flex notation), and this throws an error when you try to use them with Flex.  I think this is what they should be -
>    {baduri}                 {return BAD_URI;}
>    {badstring}             {return BAD_STRING;}
> This is obviously not a huge deal, but as an editor just thought you might like to know.  If these characters are intentional (for some reason?), I am sorry for my mistake.
> Have a good day,
> Dan Beam
> dbeam@yahoo-inc.com
> P.S. I attended and enjoyed your YUIConf presentation[s] this year (as well as the panel).

Glad to hear it!

http://tantek.com/ - I made an HTML5 tutorial! http://tantek.com/html5
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2011 01:07:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:54 UTC