- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 15:05:44 -0500
- To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- CC: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>, Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 12/31/2010 04:00 AM, Koji Ishii wrote: > It's saying "line-break: loose", not "line: loose", so I'm not sure how many > East Asians, the users of this property, would think the way you worried about. > > "lax" is also fine with me, but I wonder if others would agree with it, as > some didn't like "relaxed" either. I'll note that lax tends to have negative connotations. > Yet another proposal to solve your trouble: how about renaming the property name > to "prohibit-line-break" or "prohibit-break"? I hope "loose" would make sense > then, wouldn't it? I don't think we should be renaming either the property or the two values 'normal' and 'strict' if we can reasonably avoid it. ~fantasai
Received on Sunday, 2 January 2011 20:06:21 UTC