- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:30:06 +0000
- To: Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>, "Tab Atkins, jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "bert@w3.org" <bert@w3.org>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Rafal Chlodnicki <rchlodnicki@opera.com>
[Leif Arne Storset:] > Reading [1] and a message from 2009 [2], it seems the intention is that > when scaling gradients using background-size, B&B's "intrinsic size" [3] > should be understood as the "CSS View Box" defined in the Images spec [4]. > (The attachment, which contains a gradient with 'background-size: 60px', > illustrates that Gecko and WebKit follow this interpretation.) Is my > understanding correct? Should we be concerned about the naming ? 'View box' means something pretty specific in SVG.
Received on Monday, 14 February 2011 18:30:47 UTC