Re: [css3-background] 'background: url(foo) white' and 'background: url(foo), white' from fantasai on 2011-02-09 (www-style@w3.org from February 2011)

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:17:15 -0800
To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
CC: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, "tao.yu@nokia.com" <tao.yu@nokia.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "Art.Barstow@nokia.com" <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
Message-ID: <4D524D8B.70303@inkedblade.net>

On 01/21/2011 11:39 AM, Brian Manthos wrote:
> The "Note" about the "will have the same effect" at the end of section 3.10 is
> actually incorrect.  They might RENDER the same but the OM impact is different.
> I recommend we (a) remove it or (b) clarify and explain.

Removed.

~fantasai

Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2011 08:17:51 UTC