- From: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:04:15 +0100
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, "www-style\@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> writes: > You are right, that's exactly what I meant to put there. > Thanks! Great! Your idea makes sense to me, BTW. Instead of attempting to create columns that more likely than not will become "too narrow", just give up and set them to 0. The drawback is of course that the user will only see what overflows into the first half of the column gap. Oh well, I see that this is being discussed further down the thread along with other alternatives, so I'll join there instead if I have something useful to add. > -----Original Message----- > From: Morten Stenshorne [mailto:mstensho@opera.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 11:32 PM > >> (23) column-gap := (available-width/column-gap); > > I don't understand (23). Did you mean this, by any chance: > > (23) column-gap := (available-width/(column-count - 1)); > > ith my version of (23) it does. :) -- ---- Morten Stenshorne, developer, Opera Software ASA ---- ---- Office: +47 24164206 ---- Cellular: +47 93440112 ---- ------------------ http://www.opera.com/ -----------------
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2011 08:04:52 UTC