- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:20:00 -0800
- To: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
- CC: Mark Kenny <beingmrkenny@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>, Charles Belov <Charles.Belov@sfmta.com>
On 02/05/2011 04:15 AM, Daniel Weck wrote: > The latest editor's draft now includes a new 'speakability' property. The 'none' value of the 'speak' property has been > removed. Note how "speakability:none" is analogous to "display:none" (the prose is near-identical). > > Please review [1]. Also, the text in the 'auto' definition that begins with "Note that" doesn't belong in the definition of 'auto', it belongs in a paragraph after the value definitions because it is general to the property. # Also note that the value of the ‘visibility’ property (see [CSS3BOX]) # may affect the computed value of ‘voice-volume’, but do not affect # the ‘speakability’ property. I don't think 'visibility' should affect 'voice-volume'. It's explicitly a visual control, and as has been mentioned before, while silence is analogous to invisibility, it's not a useful behavior in the aural dimension. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 5 February 2011 18:20:34 UTC