- From: Jeremie Patonnier <jeremie.patonnier@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:14:58 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 10:15:30 UTC
Hello, As a web author, I found your proposal much more understandable and, FWIW, somewhat more "intuitive" Nonetheless, I do not really understand what is the benefit of the flex() function. In what way is it different than using min-width/min-height and max-width/max-height or even the already defined calc() function ? To me, doing this : width : flex(200px, 1fl) Is the same as : width: 1fl; min-width: 200px; And this : width : flex(200px, 0, 1fl); Looks like : width : calc(200px - 1fl); So I can understand the need for fine tunning on flex size but it could be better to relay on existing property to handle this. What do you think ? Regards -- Jeremie ............................. Web : http://jeremie.patonnier.net Twitter : @JeremiePat <http://twitter.com/JeremiePat>
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 10:15:30 UTC