- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:44:51 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 12/15/2011 02:43 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com <mailto:howcome@opera.com>> wrote: > > Personally, I think the statement is correct and should remain, but I > may be convinced by a reworded replacement. > > > It's correct, but it's incomplete because it's true not just for paged media, but for any situation where the column set is > breaking vertically. Maybe: > > "When the set of columns breaks vertically, such as in a paginated context, only the content after the last vertical break is > affected by 'column-fill'." > > That sounds better. However, somewhere something needs to specify how column content breaks vertically, e.g. to make it clear > that in a paginated context we place as much content as possible in columns on the first page before placing it in columns on > the next page. "When the multi-column element is paginated, only the last row of column boxes is affected by 'column-fill'." I think that should be sufficiently clear. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 21:45:31 UTC