- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:44:52 +0100
- To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Koji Ishii wrote:
> I see defining some i18n values first and then try to look for
> general @rule in future is a good incremental approach. But if the
> WG sees it differently and resolves not to include values that are
> only used in some scripts, it's very unfortunate for me, but
> deferring full-size-kana looks better way than defining
> @text-transform without taking enough time to think about it.
I'd rather not define script-specific values without a generic
mechanism -- it will lead to difficult discussions about which scripts
should be prioritized and why. But I think it's possible to define
@text-transform within a reasonable time -- this could be a win-win
scenario.
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Monday, 12 December 2011 16:47:56 UTC