On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Also, now it kinda looks odd that no-wrap is the only keyword that
> >> doesn't have a -reverse variant. Should we add one for consistency?
> >> I don't see much *use* for it, but if the lack would be confusing, we
> >> can fix it simply.
> >
> > What would nowrap-reverse do differently from nowrap?
>
> Flip the cross-axis.
Is there a use-case for this? If not, it's just confusing. Symmetry is not
worth adding confusing options that noone will understand. To be clear,
here's how things would layout on a fixed-width/height flexbox:
wrap:
|AB|
|C |
| |
nowrap:
|AB|C
| |
| |
wrap-reverse:
| |
|C |
|AB|
nowrap-reverse:
| |
| |
|AB|C