On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Also, now it kinda looks odd that no-wrap is the only keyword that > >> doesn't have a -reverse variant. Should we add one for consistency? > >> I don't see much *use* for it, but if the lack would be confusing, we > >> can fix it simply. > > > > What would nowrap-reverse do differently from nowrap? > > Flip the cross-axis. Is there a use-case for this? If not, it's just confusing. Symmetry is not worth adding confusing options that noone will understand. To be clear, here's how things would layout on a fixed-width/height flexbox: wrap: |AB| |C | | | nowrap: |AB|C | | | | wrap-reverse: | | |C | |AB| nowrap-reverse: | | | | |AB|CReceived on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 22:56:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:08 UTC