- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:40:59 +0100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Le 07/12/2011 17:54, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : > Indeed, you're right. Fixed now - I explain precisely what it means > for a list item to "increment the list-item counter". """ increment the list item counter ‘list-item’: if the element doesn't otherwise have a ‘counter-increment’ declaration, it must act as if ‘counter-increment: list-item’ were specified. (This does not affect the specified or computed values of the counter properties.) """ I’m not sure about other implementation, but for the "not otherwise having a declaration" test in WeasyPrint I’d have to record more information from the cascade than I currently do. `counter-increment: none`, `counter-increment: initial` and no declaration all result in having a computed value of 'none', which is the only result currently kept after the cascade. I think that this kind of thing in other properties ends up being resolved with a 'auto' properties. Here 'auto' would be the same as 'none' except when 'display' is 'list-item' Regards, -- Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 17:41:34 UTC