On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:31:09 +0100, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > in general i agree with this, however I would object to any use of the > term > "obsolete", which, at least in my reading in terms of specifications, > means > it has been superseded; since it has not been superseded, that would be > an > incorrect characterization; that is, it is (or may) still be used, it is > not necessarily out of date, and it has not been replaced by something > new To me, that would be "deprecated". Obsolete rather means "old to the point of not being (very) useful".Received on Monday, 5 December 2011 15:36:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:50:11 UTC