- From: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:32:15 +0000
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Friday, August 26, 2011 2:50 PM Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Arron Eicholz wrote: > >Yes you are correct we will need to add a * to the section of the > >grammar that is within the FUNCTION. Though I am not a grammar expert, > >I thought that \*? Would allow the possibility of adding a * to the > >FUNCTION contents and also still allow you to provide an IDENT as well > >when the situation is needed. > > Do you want to allow just :lang(*) or also :lang(en-*-US) or a variant of that? I > would expect the former to be the same as not using :lang, which would > make this not very useful on its own. Actually I just want us to properly match what the RFC4647 says is valid for matching language identifiers. This would mean that :lang(*) would be valid but also :lang(en-*) or :lang(*-Latn) or even :lang(en-Latn-*) and other variants that possibly include a *. -- Thanks, Arron Eicholz
Received on Friday, 26 August 2011 23:32:51 UTC