- From: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:56:23 +1000
- To: Luke Page <luke.a.page@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:38:31AM +0100, Luke Page wrote: > apologies if this should go somewhere more direct, but as per > http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work#contribute I notice that the above link says merely to post to www-style without pointing to the "Status of this Document" section or mentioning the "[css3-page]" etc. tags. The "Status of this Document" section always gives the preferred place where comments should be sent. In the case of css3-page, www-style is indeed the correct place to send comments, though it is preferred for the Subject of the message to include the string "[css3-page]", which I've added to the Subject for this reply. Someone with write access to http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work might consider changing that, so that review comments are less likely to go unnoticed. > I wanted to report in the CSS3 Paged Media specification > (http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-page/), the following incorrect line... > > LEFTBOTTOM_SYM ::= "@right-bottom" > > It should be LEFTBOTTOM_SYM ::= "@left-bottom" Thanks for sending this fix. I notice that this has already been fixed in the Editors' Draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-page/#syntax-page-selector (It's unfortunate that http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-page/ is still a 2006 version, and doesn't include a link to the Editors' Draft.) pjrm.
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2011 06:56:49 UTC