- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:09:58 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
That works for me; something that would be helpful now that we're on the LC-CR stretch would be a single place where all outstanding issues are tracked. Wiki, Tracker, bugzilla: doesn't matter but we're getting to the stage where changes really map to issues. Do we have that ? > -----Original Message----- > From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 12:38 PM > To: Brian Manthos > Cc: Sylvain Galineau; fantasai; www-style@w3.org > Subject: Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions Telecon 201-08-17 > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > So where do we sit on this topic? Do we focus on moving the module > forward to CR or find some way to move individual features to CR instead? > > The point is that there's no need to distinguish. > > We move the module to CR. Prefixes drop when a feature is (a) in a CR > draft, and (b) implemented such that the impl passes the test suite > sufficiently (this is self-judged). > > ~TJ
Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 22:10:38 UTC