- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:42:15 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 08/08/2011 08:15 PM, Alex Mogilevsky wrote: > There is an issue on naming of ‘flex-order’ property that we didn’t get a resolution for at F2F: > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#flex-order > > I propose keeping flex-order. I think it is better because > > ·Z-index is “position on Z axis”, or “value of Z”. It could just be called “Z” but it probably isn’t because it is integer. > > ·Flex-order is order of processing. It is not “index on flex axis” or “value of flex” > > ·Keeping the name “order” directly points at the fact that flexbox reorders its children for all purposes. > > Any arguments in favor of “flex-index”? I still think consistency with z-index makes sense: - Like z-index, which indicates order on the z-axis, it indicates the order on the flexbox main axis - Like z-index, items with the same value are grouped and subsorted by document order ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 15 August 2011 19:42:46 UTC