There is an issue on naming of 'flex-order' property that we didn't get a resolution for at F2F: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#flex-order I propose keeping flex-order. I think it is better because * Z-index is "position on Z axis", or "value of Z". It could just be called "Z" but it probably isn't because it is integer. * Flex-order is order of processing. It is not "index on flex axis" or "value of flex" * Keeping the name "order" directly points at the fact that flexbox reorders its children for all purposes. Any arguments in favor of "flex-index"?Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2011 03:15:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:03 UTC