RE: [css3-images] 5.2 radial-gradient() Syntax

"Only difference" -- Yes.

Ok, it just seemed odd to me.  Background shorthand grammar shows how to reference the syntax of background-position (via <bg-position>) so it seemed disjoint to reference it in a different way when doing so from another module.


-----Original Message-----
From: Tab Atkins Jr. [] 
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 5:32 PM
To: Brian Manthos
Subject: Re: [css3-images] 5.2 radial-gradient() Syntax

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Brian Manthos <> wrote:
>        [<'background-position'>,]?
>        [<bg-position>,]?

That's the only difference, right?

If so, then either is valid, but I don't have to define what <'background-position'> means - according to the Values module, it means "whatever is accepted by the 'background-position' property".


Received on Saturday, 13 August 2011 00:34:20 UTC