- From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:33:50 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
"Only difference" -- Yes. Ok, it just seemed odd to me. Background shorthand grammar shows how to reference the syntax of background-position (via <bg-position>) so it seemed disjoint to reference it in a different way when doing so from another module. -Brian -----Original Message----- From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 5:32 PM To: Brian Manthos Cc: www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: [css3-images] 5.2 radial-gradient() Syntax On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote: > [<'background-position'>,]? ... > [<bg-position>,]? That's the only difference, right? If so, then either is valid, but I don't have to define what <'background-position'> means - according to the Values module, it means "whatever is accepted by the 'background-position' property". ~TJ
Received on Saturday, 13 August 2011 00:34:20 UTC