- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:31:50 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > I still don't understand. It seems simple enough on the surface to be able to determine e.g. what the 'start' side is, translate it to a physical side and proceed as normal. > > Or do you mean implementation-wise it is hard to track the value throughout the background and into the image? > > So far this is only about affecting the direction within the gradient itself, and not about affecting background property values such as 'background-position'. Does that make it harder to track? Indeed. It doesn't seem particularly harder to do this than it would be to track logical keywords in any other property, like text-align. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 12 August 2011 22:32:37 UTC