- From: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:08:44 -0700
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 8/10/11 3:38 PM, "Alex Mogilevsky" <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote: >± From: Vincent Hardy [mailto:vhardy@adobe.com] >± Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 3:26 PM >± >± On 8/10/11 3:00 PM, "Håkon Wium Lie" <howcome@opera.com> wrote: >± > >± >Another use case which illuminates the interface between regions and >± >structural styling is a magazine articles with regions galore on the >± >first page, and then it switches to simple multi-column layout from >± >page 2 and onwards. How can one comine regions with multicol layouts? >± >± As the spec. draft stands, there is no way to do that since we decided >to only allow >± elements that are block container boxes to be regions. If we allowed >multi-columns to be >± regions, then we could simply allow content: >± flow-from(..) on multi-column elements (or the syntax we end up >agreeing on for flow-from). > >I think the last time we brought it up we wanted to allow multicolumn >regions. That would be very useful. > >Another way to look at it could be that column properties apply to >regions - with the same effect. I have added an issue to our list (http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css3-regions) and a proposal to support multi-column as regions. Vincent
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2011 21:09:28 UTC