- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:47:40 +1000
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr. (jackalmage@gmail.com)" <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Masataka Yakura <myakura.web@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/08/2011 1:13 PM, Brian Manthos wrote: > So a new syntax was conceived, proposed, accepted, and applied to the > draft in a single TeleCon? > > Wouldn't it be nice if everything else in CSS3 Gradients resolved > that quickly. > > For the record, I'm opposed to tying background property behavior to > writing modes. That's new functionality that I think is both > non-sensical and troubling. > > Tab -- Please raise an issue that this implementer has concerns about > adding these new keywords. > > -Brian Brian, we discussed this test case offlist last month (with a min-width media query). http://css-class.com/test/css/bidi/kanji-test-linear-gradient-media.htm In IE10 preview 1, visual values were behaving as logical values. Now in IE10 preview 2, this has been corrected. If I was to be able to use this gradient and keyword, linear-gradient(start, blue, white 50%, green 100%); as a narrowed the viewport, the gradient would change to running from visual left (logical start) to visual right (logical end) to running from visual top (logical start) to visual bottom (logical end). To say that you have never heard of start, end, before, or after used with linear gradients until now is false since this is what I mentioned to you offlist over a month ago. -- Alan Gresley http://css-3d.org/ http://css-class.com/
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2011 03:48:07 UTC