W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2011

Re: [css3-images] object-* at-risk

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:53:24 -0700
Message-ID: <4E39A734.5050708@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 08/03/2011 12:26 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Leif Arne Storset<lstorset@opera.com>  wrote:
>> Of course, we also implement the 'none' value (which HP may or may not
>> implement) and the 'auto' value (which has been rejected by the WG). AFAIK
>> no-one implements 'scale-down' yet. It would be reasonable to mark 'none'
>> and 'scale-down' as at-risk, if marking parts of a property at-risk is a
>> done thing.
> That seems reasonable.
> Everyone else, does it seem okay to make the object-* properties not
> at-risk, and only mark the "none" and "scale-down" values of
> object-fit as at-risk?

I'd kick them to L4. I disagree with adding 'none', at least.

Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 19:53:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:02 UTC