- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:57:59 -0700
- To: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
- CC: www style <www-style@w3.org>
On 08/01/2011 10:27 AM, Daniel Weck wrote: > > On 1 Aug 2011, at 19:20, fantasai wrote: >>> --- >>> Possible values are 'child', 'young' and 'old', indicating the preferred >>> age category to match during voice selection. The mapping with SSML ages >>> is defined as follows: 'child' = up to 15 y/o, 'young' = between 16 and >>> 45 y/o, 'old' = 46 y/o onwards. >>> NOTE: The interpretation of the relationship between a person's age and >>> a recognizable type of voice cannot realistically be defined in a universal >>> manner, as it effectively depends on numerous cultural and linguistic >>> variations. The values provided by this specification therefore represent >>> a simplified model that can be reasonably applied to a great variety of >>> speech locales, albeit at the cost of a certain degree of approximation. >>> Future versions of this specification may refine the level of precision >>> of the voice-matching algorithm, as speech processor implementations >>> become more standardized. >>> --- > > I think that the informative note (pleonasm, I know :) is useful, do you > have any comments on the formulation? Mmm, thrown in "biological" in addition to "cultural and linguistic"? :) Voice change ages vary person-to-person. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 1 August 2011 17:58:29 UTC