- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:41:55 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Friday 2011-04-29 12:55 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > The re-use of 'vertical-align' to do content alignment in table cells > was inarguably a mistake. It was? Having different properties that do similar things in different contexts can be confusing -- authors might have trouble remembering which one is which. Also, for the record, the box-align proposal we discussed a few years back was about horizontal alignment only. The proposal in this thread seems substantially different, since it puts the alignment property on the parent instead of the children, and has alignment on both axes. This adds the capability to align vertically, but removes the capability of aligning different child blocks differently, and perhaps confuses the model a good bit as well. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Saturday, 30 April 2011 03:42:24 UTC