- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:32:44 -0700
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Right now, the Lists module defines the CJK longhand styles up to 10^16 (ten quadrillion). This is pretty excessive, as we can't actually *test* this high (implementation use either 2- or 4-byte signed integers to track counter values, which have a maximum range of either 30k or 2 billion). I'd like to trim this down to a smaller range, which would allow us to test the full range and let me eliminate some complexity from the algorithm. Specifically, I want to limit the the CJK longhand styles to a maximum value of 9999. This has some nice simplicity benefits. Within this range, the Japanese and Korean styles can be expressed using the 'additive' counter-style algorithm, so they can be removed from section 4.3 entirely and just exist as entries in the default UA stylesheet. The Chinese styles still need to be defined with a special algorithm (the zero-collapsing rule that Chinese uses can't be represented by any of the existing counter-style algorithms), but the range limits it to only the first "group", which is *much* easier to talk about. I don't think I lose any useful amount of power, either. I think that I can state that the 99% is a conservative estimate for the percentage of lists on the web that need less than 100 values. Going up to 1000 gives us virtually everything else. My proposal to have the range go up to 10k covers this and a bit more; I suggest this range mainly because it's a convenient cleave point. I have produced lists with more than 10k members before, but only as part of a database dump while debugging an application. Other list styles are either defined over *all* numbers, or have a similarly limited range, usually only covering up to roughly 10k or 1M. This change will bring the CJK longhand styles into alignment with that implied pattern as well. Unless there's a strong objection with good reasoning as to why the CJK longhand styles need to be able to render list counters above 10k, I'll make this change this week. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2011 18:33:31 UTC