- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:09:12 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 5:03 PM > > > And would this mean that you are then satisfied with how easy it is to > apply absolute flex, so the default value for preferred size in flex() > function can be *initial value*, and > "width:flex(2)"=="width:flex(2,0,auto)" ? > > I was thinking that the ordering would put the preferred size first, so > you'd say "flex(auto,2)", but if you prefer the other ordering with the > preferred size last, that's cool too. I don't have a strong opinion. With some other properties we have space separated lists where arguments can go in an order. Is there a precedent in applying that to functional notation? Then flex(auto,2) could mean same as flex(2,auto). And flex(1)==flex(auto). It would seem consistent with other syntax where people don't have to remember argument order when arguments are strongly typed.
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 00:09:42 UTC