- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:02:47 -0700
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 2:15 PM >> >> Nah, using 'fr' (or 'fl', whatever) for absolute flex and >> 'flex(<pref>,<pos-flex>,<neg-flex>)' for relative flex. >> > > I think it is worth trying. It means > > 2fr == flex(2,0,0px) > > Right? Yes. > And would this mean that you are then satisfied with how easy it is to apply absolute flex, so the default value for preferred size in flex() function can be *initial value*, and "width:flex(2)"=="width:flex(2,0,auto)" ? I was thinking that the ordering would put the preferred size first, so you'd say "flex(auto,2)", but if you prefer the other ordering with the preferred size last, that's cool too. I don't have a strong opinion. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 00:03:34 UTC