- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:26:36 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 4/12/11 6:14 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > We (Chrome) also noted this issue and think it's a problem. Not sure > what the right solution would be, unfortunately. You want the > orientation to be separate from the width/height. You don't want to > specify the orientation in the markup (as an attribute in HTML), as a > reactive design might change the slider orientation when the layout > changes, to better fill the new area. Or it might not. The current spec _forces_ the orientation to change. That doesn't seem like a good idea. An attribute could be modified via script as a last-ditch fallback to deal with layout changes (though that might take UAs implementing onresize support on random elements). > The only think I can think of that would work properly is a > slider-specific CSS property that specifies the orientation. How would this be better than an attribute in the markup? I feel like I'm missing something. -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 03:27:07 UTC