- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:44:36 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:34 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: [snip] Overall, sounds good! > min-content width: > Defined as the min-content width of the contents (same as now). * > (Alternatively, define as the width of a multicol element with the > column count and column gap as specified and the column-width as > the min-content width of the contents.) Columns are all the same width, right? If so, then the alternative is better - it more accurately reflects the actual smallest width that you could make the element. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 00:45:23 UTC