- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 02:49:34 +1000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 2/04/2011 5:49 PM, fantasai wrote: > As part of the Last Call process, the CSSWG must prepare a summary > of all Last Call comments received and how they were addressed. > > The first few drafts were prepared by Arron Eicholz and John Jansen; > I've spent today reviewing it and correcting some errors. I have yet > to triple-check it, but I think this is just about final, and wanted > to send it out for your review sooner rather than later. > > So if you have sent in LC comments on CSS2.1, please take a look and > make sure your issue was accurately recorded. In particular, if your > feedback was rejected and you did not follow up to say whether you > accepted or objected to the WG's resolution of the issue, please let > us know your position. > > Disposition of Comments: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css2-src/issues-lc-2011.html > Latest draft: > http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/draft-PR-CSS21-201103XX/ > > Note that comments received after the Last Call deadline were not > included. > > Thanks~ > > ~fantasai I very very late with this but I see issues with '4 Syntax and basic data types' [1]. In my recent post to this list [2], you can see some of the issues that I have. I have got a lot more test cases offline regarding 'Syntax and basic data types' including parsing of malformed statements and how browsers treat many test case differently. Glazou (elsewhere) said that I should put my test online but that is a huge job. How should I proceed? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0113.html -- Alan http://css-class.com/ Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo
Received on Monday, 4 April 2011 16:50:13 UTC