- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:57:35 -0700
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
as long as the spec. is clear I am happy. (It might be good to say where HSL is first defined that it's full range, but I leave this to the discretion of the editor) On Sep 29, 2010, at 6:34 , Chris Lilley wrote: > Hello www-style, > > Dave Singer wrote: >> Is the HSL full-range (0-255 luminance) or video-range (16-235 >> luminance)? This makes a BIG difference. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jul/0467.html > > I notice that there was no response to this part of your comments. The answer is that the HSL values are full range not video range, as the algorithm 'to translate HSL to RGB' and examples given in section 4.2.4 makes clear. > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-color/Overview.html#hsl-color > > Therefore, no specification change was necessary. Dave, please respond to say that you agree with this conclusion. > > -- > Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain > W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead > Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG > Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:58:11 UTC