- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:21:21 -0700
- To: "KangHao Lu (Kenny)" <kennyluck@w3.org>
- CC: www-style <www-style@w3.org>, WWW International <www-international@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
On 09/27/2010 09:33 AM, KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote: > >> Before and after refer to the position relative to the >> block progression, in my mind. It's not about top of line coincidence. >> >> I think that above and below are confusing, since they suggest physical >> locations that are not appropriate for vertical text. > > I do think this is confusing as well. It only makes sense if you imagine > some English words embedded in vertical writing and then you figure out > the "above" side is the "right" side. "over" and "under" are maybe better. Yeah, that's what I was thinking. > The question is, does this orientation depend on > "text-underline-position"? I have the feeling that this will make things > even more confusing. No, I don't think that would make sense. :) > Can we actually make the initial value for "ruby-position" "auto"? So it > will default to "before" for Japanese, "right" for zh-TW, and "after" > for Mongolian. I think this is similar to how "text-underline-position" > is defined. I'm skeptical that this auto-position feature is actually a good idea. The problem is coming up with a definitive list of all possible language tags that would want the position one way rather than the other way. I would rather have the author set the style. It's designed to inherit independently of everything else, so for a monolingual document, setting it once on the root element is sufficient. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 01:22:08 UTC