W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Linear gradients, Transforms and angles...

From: Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 07:42:05 -0700
Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, "L. DavidBaron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-id: <A8AACAAA-F947-40D7-A405-DE7F2AE41555@apple.com>
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>

On Sep 22, 2010, at 11:58 PM, Daniel Glazman wrote:

> Le 23/09/10 01:36, David Singer a écrit :
>> I think users want rotations (transforms) and gradients to be consistent -- that two, at 45º, go the same way.  They want to learn one, well-defined, coordinate space, not have to remember that there are two somewhat intuitive, but different, conventions at work depending on what they are working with.
> And that's the whole point of my original message: it's not
> the case today.

Oh, oh. Wait, which side are you arguing. It's true that it's not consistent today. Gradients go counter-clockwise, everything else goes clockwise. So the correct solution is to make gradients go clockwise, right?

Received on Sunday, 26 September 2010 14:43:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:49:48 UTC