- From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:57:47 -0700
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Le Ven 24 septembre 2010 8:24, Boris Zbarsky a écrit : > On 9/24/10 2:43 AM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote: >> Right now, Chrome 6.0.472.62 render this testcase differently from >> Firefox >> 3.6.10 and from Opera 10.62. I do not see anything in the spec which can >> decisively state which rendering is correct. I even think that such >> testcase should be removed as it could be rendered both ways (depending >> on >> algorithm chosen). Am I wrong? > > I believe the spec explicitly states that the rendering of this testcase > is undefined.... (section 10.2 last paragraph under <percentage>, plus > the complete lack of any useful definition of shrink-to-fit sizing). > It's an interop problem that the renderings differ, of course. > >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/block-replaced-width-007.htm > > > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/float-replaced-width-012.htm > > > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/absolute-replaced-width-007.htm > > Same thing. > >> Spec quotes: > > The HTML4 spec is irrelevant here. Note that the percentage here is NOT > a percentage intrinsic width. It's just a percentage specified width. > And section 10.2 says that even the computed value of width (forget the > used value) is undefined in this case... > > -Boris Thank you Boris. That makes 15 testcases in section 10.3.x of CSS 2.1 test suite RC1 which should be removed then. regards, Gérard -- CSS 2.1 Test suite RC1 (September 17th 2010) http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/toc.html Contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ Web authors' contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Friday, 24 September 2010 17:58:24 UTC