- From: Paul Duffin <pduffin@volantis.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 02:27:35 -0600 (MDT)
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
----- Original Message ----- > On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 23:07:03 +0200, Paul Duffin <pduffin@volantis.com> > wrote: > >> Anne van Kesteren, who sent the first response on this thread, is > >> listed as a current editor. > > > > He did but he did not say that the CSS Namespace was not intended to > > be > > used in other parts of CSS or that it was not a general CSS > > namespace > > mechanism. > > I don't think it should be a general CSS mechanism. In fact, I think > we > should never have added @namespace, but I was not around when that > happened. > Ok, fair enough. What are your particular issues with @namespace, and how would you have addressed the need to style qualified XML documents?
Received on Saturday, 18 September 2010 08:28:09 UTC