- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:29:37 +0200
- To: "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:22:32 +0200, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > Le 14/09/10 09:32, Anne van Kesteren a écrit : >> Why? They have vastly different use cases. It seems perfectly logical to >> me, too, that the resolved values are readonly. They are after all based >> on all the rules in the style sheet. What would it even mean to edit >> them? > > Warf!!! Having them read-write would be incredibly useful for editing > tools ! Instead of dealing with rule modification, being able to > directly tweak the resolved value and have it modify the originating > rule would save a LOT of code and most certainly bugs... > I'm with Tab here. Editing the cascaded value (if it excludes UA and user style sheets) makes sense I suppose (haven't thought much about it) but editing the resolved value (either computed or used) does not. The styles used to compute the resolved value can come from anywhere. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2010 11:30:17 UTC