- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:38:46 -0700
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Cc: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>, Philippe Wittenbergh <ph.wittenbergh@l-c-n.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > On Sep 10, 2010, at 8:01 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com> wrote: >>> I see what BZ means. Almost the entire length of the gradient is >>> semi-opaque. It seems to become more transparent at an even rate. I myself >>> would like what is currently happening for some cases. Here is an example. >>> >>> <http://css-class.com/test/css/colors/gradient-test1.htm> >>> >>> It would look different if the gradients were premultiplied. >> >> Right, it would look different. The point is that it would look >> *better* in most situations. > > I think we should strive for consistency here with:' > * SVG gradients > * color transitions > > In the latter case, if I have a horizontal gradient, and I run a transition on 'left' and 'background-color' of a child element over the top, the background-color of that child should match the color of the portion of the gradient it is over. Agreed. > We've already decided to use premultiplied colors for transitions. FWIW. Excellent. I'll commit to the change, then. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 10 September 2010 16:39:39 UTC