W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2010

Re: [css3-images] Gradients feedback

From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:49:31 -0700
Cc: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>, Philippe Wittenbergh <ph.wittenbergh@l-c-n.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-id: <B53F84D2-D549-4472-A7AE-CCDE9563E1D3@me.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On Sep 10, 2010, at 8:01 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com> wrote:
>> I see what BZ means. Almost the entire length of the gradient is
>> semi-opaque. It seems to become more transparent at an even rate. I myself
>> would like what is currently happening for some cases. Here is an example.
>> <http://css-class.com/test/css/colors/gradient-test1.htm>
>> It would look different if the gradients were premultiplied.
> Right, it would look different.  The point is that it would look
> *better* in most situations.

I think we should strive for consistency here with:'
* SVG gradients
* color transitions

In the latter case, if I have a horizontal gradient, and I run a transition on 'left' and 'background-color' of a child element over the top, the background-color of that child should match the color of the portion of the gradient it is over.

We've already decided to use premultiplied colors for transitions. FWIW.

Received on Friday, 10 September 2010 15:51:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:49:47 UTC