- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:49:31 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>, Philippe Wittenbergh <ph.wittenbergh@l-c-n.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sep 10, 2010, at 8:01 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com> wrote: >> I see what BZ means. Almost the entire length of the gradient is >> semi-opaque. It seems to become more transparent at an even rate. I myself >> would like what is currently happening for some cases. Here is an example. >> >> <http://css-class.com/test/css/colors/gradient-test1.htm> >> >> It would look different if the gradients were premultiplied. > > Right, it would look different. The point is that it would look > *better* in most situations. I think we should strive for consistency here with:' * SVG gradients * color transitions In the latter case, if I have a horizontal gradient, and I run a transition on 'left' and 'background-color' of a child element over the top, the background-color of that child should match the color of the portion of the gradient it is over. We've already decided to use premultiplied colors for transitions. FWIW. Simon
Received on Friday, 10 September 2010 15:51:00 UTC