- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:07:22 -0700
- To: Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>
- Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: >>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 4:28 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: >>>> Given that duplicate properties are handled on >>>> a last-one-wins basis, repeating the transition-property list itself seems >>>> less >>>> desirable and more prone to causing unwelcome surprises. >>> >>> I'm not sure what you mean by "repeating the transition-property list >>> itself". >> >> He means, given CSS like "transition-property: color, >> background-color; transition-duration: 1s 2s 3s;", cycling >> transition-property to match the length of the duration list, >> obtaining a result identical to "transition-property: color, >> background-color, color; transition-duration: 1s 2s 3s;". > > I agree that we should not repeat transition-property. But in your example above I assume you mean to have commas between each time value? ... Yes. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 09:08:13 UTC