- From: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 21:51:16 -0400
- To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "Håkon Wium Lie" <howcome@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org
> On 10/23/2010 04:19 PM, Shelby Moore wrote: >> [snip] >> >>> Maybe if we did that only to terms defined in that particular >>> module, it would be okay (possibly with an exception for CSS3 >>> Box, which defines most of those very common ones). >> >> And then add a standard Appendix to every CSS spec, Terms Defined >> Elsewhere. > > It doesn't need to be an appendix, it can just be a link to the > specs where the terms are defined. But for those terms that are not defined in the current spec, per your suggestion will not be direct linking from or calling them out in context with italics, then we have to place a list of them some where in the spec so we know which terms apply to which spec we are linking to.
Received on Sunday, 24 October 2010 01:52:43 UTC